The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has approved eleven digital-asset-focused national trust banks between December 2025 and August 2026. These novel structures do not take deposits, do not make loans, and carry no FDIC insurance, quietly redefining the banking architecture for the stablecoin and tokenization era.
🔑 Key takeaways
- The OCC granted final approval to Circle National Trust on July 10, 2026, the first fully operational federal crypto bank
- Eleven crypto institutions received preliminary or final approval between December 2025 and August 2026, including BitGo, Coinbase, Ripple, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley Digital
- Unlike commercial banks, these trust banks do not accept deposits, do not lend, and do not benefit from FDIC insurance
- The approval of World Liberty Trust Company, affiliated with the Trump family, has triggered sharp political controversy in Congress
- The OCC plans to publish its final GENIUS Act rule by November 2026, which could reshape the sector again
The OCC opens a federal pathway for digital assets
The US banking regulator issued conditional approvals to five digital firms simultaneously in December 2025: BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, Paxos, Ripple, and Circle. These charters join Anchorage Digital Bank, operational since February 2026, the first institution of its kind.

Final approval went to Circle National Trust on July 10, 2026, operating as First National Digital Currency Bank. At launch, the institution will provide fiduciary custody services for digital assets held by Circle and its affiliates, with USDC reserve management and institutional custody listed as future capabilities. In less than nine months, the regulator has validated eleven new entities.
| Institution | OCC status | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Anchorage Digital Bank | Operational | Completed Feb 2026 |
| BitGo | Conditional (conversion) | Dec 12, 2025 |
| Fidelity Digital Assets | Conditional (conversion) | Dec 12, 2025 |
| Paxos | Conditional (conversion) | Dec 12, 2025 |
| Ripple National Trust Bank | Preliminary | Dec 12, 2025 |
| Circle National Trust | Final | Jul 10, 2026 |
| Bridge National Trust Bank | Preliminary | Feb 12, 2026 |
| Foris DAX (Crypto.com) | Preliminary | Feb 20, 2026 |
| Coinbase National Trust | Preliminary | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Morgan Stanley Digital Trust | Preliminary | Jun 18, 2026 |
| World Liberty Trust Company | Preliminary | Aug 14, 2026 |
Comptroller Jonathan Gould stated on August 19, 2026 that 23 of the 40 de novo charter applications received over the previous 18 months included digital-asset activity in their business plans. The OCC already supervises roughly 60 national trust banks before this crypto wave, with the new cohort representing nearly 20% of the total.
A pre-existing legal framework adapted to crypto
The national trust bank status predates cryptocurrencies by decades. Unlike commercial banks that combine deposit-taking, payment accounts, lending, and asset custody, trust banks rely on fiduciary work: holding property on behalf of another party, administering assets, executing instructions, and maintaining records.
« Most national trust banks do not make loans, do not accept deposits, and do not benefit from FDIC insurance. Yet this model fits digital assets perfectly: institutions need a regulated entity to safeguard private keys, segregate client assets, and connect transfers with conventional settlement. »
OCC official communication
The Morgan Stanley Digital decision placed assets under administration at uninsured national trust banks at $7.2 trillion as of March 31, 2026, including $1.7 trillion in custody and safekeeping accounts. That scale demonstrates the addressable market these new crypto structures can capture.
Timothy Massad, former chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and a senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School, distinguishes two categories of digital assets: those representing tokenized financial assets (stocks, bonds), and unbacked crypto assets whose value depends solely on market confidence. This distinction shapes the regulation to come and the OCC’s trade-offs.
World Liberty Trust Company: the Trump controversy
The August 14, 2026 preliminary approval for World Liberty Trust Company (WLTC) cast a spotlight on family ties to the US president. WLTC is an affiliate of World Liberty Financial, backed by the Trump family. DT Marks SC LLC, a corporate entity linked to the presidential family, holds an investment in the proposed bank, and Eric Trump signed an agreement regarding that stake.
WLTC plans to issue and redeem the USD1 stablecoin directly to domestic clients for US dollars. Currently, BitGo handles key parts of USD1 for World Liberty; the new bank would internalize those essential services. The economic model relies on interest earned on reserves: $1 billion of USD1 in circulation requires roughly $1 billion in reserves, productive as long as tokens circulate on the market.
« President Trump is now the first president in history to approve, operate, and oversee his own bank. It is the boldest act of self-interest our financial system has ever seen, and Congress cannot allow it. »
Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts
Trump’s financial disclosures showed over $1 billion in crypto gains last year, including $515 million from WLFI token sales and $65 million in equity sales. The CEO of WLF, Zach Witkoff, is the son of Steven Witkoff, Trump’s Middle East negotiator. The OCC responded that career staff reviewed the application and supervises the institution in line with applicable laws, a defense that has not convinced congressional Democrats.
Threats to conventional banks
Conventional custody banks look the most exposed. Their historical advantage rested on operating trusted assets and connections with market infrastructure. A crypto-native trust bank makes the same claim for tokenized assets, with software and stablecoin distribution already inside the corporate group.
Three banking categories are directly in the firing line of this shift:
- Custody banks: potential loss of market share in digital-asset custody to specialized trust banks
- Payment processors: risk of settlement migrating from account-to-account messaging to direct tokenized-dollar transfers
- Commercial lenders: indirect exposure if tokenization erodes the informational advantage banks hold over borrowers
Timothy Massad notes that protocols on Ethereum already allow one crypto-asset to be swapped for another in a fully automated and decentralized way. These protocols, initially designed for speculative assets, could serve assets with real value — stocks, bonds, real estate — via smart contracts. The prospect of a mass migration of traditional securities to blockchain has the entire banking sector on edge.
The US regulatory context
No comprehensive federal regulatory framework exists yet for cryptocurrencies in the United States. The SEC established a crypto task force in January 2025 to provide regulatory clarity, dropping enforcement actions against Coinbase and Ripple. The derivatives regulator is trying to fill the gap left by the absence of harmonized legislation.
Congress is simultaneously reviewing several major bills:
- The Clarity Act would create a new regulatory framework for digital assets and define SEC and CFTC jurisdictions
- The GENIUS Act would specifically regulate stablecoins, their reserves, and capital requirements for issuers
- A bicameral working group (House Financial Services and Agriculture committees, Senate Banking and Agriculture) was formed in February 2025 to advance digital-asset policy
The OCC plans to publish its final GENIUS Act rule by November 2026. Kenneth Kelly, president of the American Bankers Association, said lenders are « encouraged that a growing number of senators share our deep concern about the current stablecoin rewards language in the Clarity Act and the risk it poses to bank lending and economic activity. »
Conclusion: toward a new American banking map
The multiplication of crypto national trust banks formalizes a new reality: a growing share of US financial infrastructure is migrating to entities that are regulated but distinct from traditional banks. Without FDIC, deposits, or lending, these structures stay light while capturing the most dynamic segments — institutional custody, tokenization, stablecoin issuance. The US banking regulator is betting on a new hybrid architecture rather than a comprehensive overhaul of the existing system.
The central scenario for 2026-2027 hinges on the finalization of the GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act, which could either codify this model or constrain it. The World Liberty Trust Company decision will remain a major political test: can a divided Congress oppose an expansion driven by the executive branch? The answer will determine whether America’s new banking map is drawn from Washington or from the courts.
Sources
- CryptoSlate — America is creating a new class of crypto banks
- Harvard Kennedy School PolicyCast — Timothy Massad
- Bank for International Settlements
- Congressional Research Service
- Politico — Banks vs crypto war
- Axios — Trump World Liberty Financial
This article is published for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice. Do your own research (DYOR) before making any decision.

