An analysis published by the account Ape (@immrape) and relayed by Changpeng Zhao on November 4 describes a coordinated amplification of hostile content on X following the Binance hack. The study covers 11,700 posts from 1,083 accounts between October 30 and November 2, generating 20.93 million impressions, with nearly 80% consisting of replies to other posts. Its author classifies 3,354 posts as false and identifies recurring connections among some accounts, but has no direct evidence that a competing platform organized or financed the campaign. The findings fuel concerns about the spread of rumors and insolvency allegations without identifying a sponsor or establishing a common chain of command.
Source: Read the original article
Disclaimer: this content is for information purposes only and is not financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile: you may lose all of your capital. Always do your own research. Legal notice
